Daemon JAM

Could You Tube be the death of sport on TV?

Posted on 22. Jun, 2010 by in Marketing

Earlier this year, for the first time, You Tube carried a sports event live around the world.  Around 50 million people tuned in/logged on to live coverage of the Indian Premier League (IPL) with You Tube carrying all 60 games live.

Sure, ESPN has carried live games on its website for a while as do owners like MLB if games are not being televised live (although there are a lot of baseball games in a season) but the IPL example was simultaneous broadcast and webcast through a recognised web only ‘caster.

PYou Tube IPLaying good money for the rights to sports coverage is a well trodden path.  It is arguably sports coverage alone which drove the speed of penetration for pay-TV channel Sky in the UK.  They not only bought exclusive rights to key sports, notably the EPL and key international fixtures, but then hugely extended the number of games they televised, widening the appeal of pay-TV to more sports fans. 

It is for this reason that the Federal Government introduced the anti-siphoning list to ensure that key sports events remain ‘available free of charge to all Australians’.

Interestingly, I don’t know if webcasting live sports in Australia would fall foul of the anti-siphoning laws?  I am guessing not as this law was designed to retain free to air access to key sports, which arguably You Tube or any other webcaster could provide.  This list is pretty extensive and includes 12 sports categories from the Olympic Games through AFL and NRL games to the FIFA World Cup.

But what of the reach and appeal to the sports fan and equally importantly to the advertiser?  With increasing access to broadband technology and ‘internet TV’ which delivers IP content direct to a TV, I think as consumers we’re part way there already.  According to UM’s Wave4, nearly 80% of Australian web users have already watched video content online, so it feels like a fairly small step to live content.

From an advertising perspective, the web also offers a wide range of potential advantages.  Messaging can be targeted better with interaction and dialogue much more readily encouraged.  Most interesting of all might be content integration and dynamic ‘in game’ messaging.

Ultimately how we watch sport will be commercially driven – who pays the most for the rights to broadcast or webcast any given sport based on their predicted returns (although that strategy didn’t work so well for Setanta in Europe!). 

With that in mind, the IPL sold 10 year TV broadcast rights for US$1.2 billion and the single year ‘webcast license’ to You Tube for US$10 million – quite a gap to close!

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Could You Tube be the death of sport on TV?”

  1. Christin

    24. Feb, 2013

    Hurrah, that’s what I was looking for, what a data! existing here at this web site, thanks admin of this website.

  2. Office cleaning glasgow

    12. Jun, 2013

    Marvelous, what a weblog it is! This weblog presents valuable
    information to us, keep it up.

  3. Louisville Personal

    18. Jun, 2013

    hi!,I really like your writing so much! percentage we communicate more about your post on AOL?
    I need an expert on this house to solve my problem.
    Maybe that is you! Taking a look ahead to peer you.

  4. screenflow coupon

    28. Jul, 2013

    After I originally left a comment I appear to
    have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment
    is added I recieve 4 emails with the exact same comment.
    There has to be an easy method you are able to
    remove me from that service? Kudos!

Leave a Reply

wordpress hit counter